Skip to main content

Trade Shows Post-Pandemic

Trade shows have been an essential part of the jewelry business in the US for the last half century or more.  We have seen transitions, expansions, contractions, and evolution over those years, but we now confront unfamiliar, highly disruptive forces. Pandemic and social distress.

The pandemic will leave us with an altered retail environment, but it is one that was coming slowly anyway.  Department stores have not been able to counter the efficiencies and range of cyber-retail, and have been shrinking and fading for years now.  Independent stores of all sorts, not just jewelry, have also been disappearing at a rapid rate, though mostly because the country became badly over-stored in the boom years of the malls, and for many other reasons.

So something had to change.  We didn't know into what, but we did know that retail formats were not keeping up with how people lived, worked, and shopped.

What I recall so clearly are the halcyon days when there were dozens of expanding jewelry chains and working at trade shows meant appointments from opening day to the last hours of the show.  For a few years now a few chains dominated, with many dozens of others either closed or merged.  There went the endless appointments.

It was also a time when there were nearly three times as many independent jewelers in the country then there are now.

Some trade shows used to have vendor waiting lists.  Trade shows used to have aisles crowded with buyers.  Trade shows used to be big party times.  Much of that is gone now, pandemic or not.

Does that mean trade shows should disappear?  Not at all.  I listened in today on a CIBJO event on the subject, where the speakers were from four major shows - Basel, JCK, Hong Kong and Vicenza.  It was informative and confirmation of the problems. All the participants fully acknowledged that the shows will be back, but not as we have known them.

There are the obvious new issues to deal with, principally procedures to protect visitors from Covid-19, and dealing with what will probably be a slow return of both buyers and vendors.  There was a consensus that any show going forward will need to be virtual as well as actual, though nobody is sure what that will look like or how effective it will be.  No doubt, plans are being developed that were not revealed during the session.

This is going to be tough, and many questions remain open.  Will the shows shrink to match turnout, and if so, how will the costs be carried?  Will vendors and buyers pay more to attend?  At least as far as we can see, air travel will be resisted, and may not be available.  Will hotels and restaurants be set up to deal safely with conventions?  And how will merchandise be sanitized and handled as they go from one person to another, a problem confronting retailers as well?  And will the shows survive if 2021 does not work?  If an effective way is developed to promote lines on virtual shows, will that in turn produce more actual shows, perhaps more focused and smaller, but more expensive?

If we dig into the issue, the questions and possible solutions are almost endless.  No doubt that the efforts will be made, and 2021 will be the first test of new show models.

However it turns out, shows have real value in this business.  There is serendipity - the chance discovery of a previously unknown line that suits a retailer's business.  There is the importance of working on and deepening partnerships between retailers and vendors, on how to handle product that does not turn well, for example.  There is the maintenance of industry relationships - we are, after all, a small industry - that help in learning about new ways to promote and sell, in hearing of trends, and in general education.

The path will be found, because jewelry has timeless attraction.  It isn't going away!  But shows will need to be relevant, accessible, affordable, and fun!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 Issues for 2015 - #5. The New Consumer

Well, the summer break is over, and we are facing a Fall season that does not seem to have much momentum.  Last time, I wrote about retailers' issues, though there is much more one can say on that subject. Now, let's think about the consumers.  Where are they?  Who are they? And will they show up this season? There is plenty of evidence that the public we have grown so accustomed to in the Consumer Age has evolved, or is evolving, into a very different public, one that has reset some values and taken a hard look what it takes to earn a dollar, and just how to spend that dollar. Maybe the best way to begin to describe this transforming mindset of the public is to make a list of what we see. Keeping up with the Jones's is dead.  Acquisition for its own sake, and to show off what we own is no more, though personal satisfaction is still there.  So that means that what you own means less than what you've done and where you've been.  (I exclude the super-rich, who

The New De Beers

This past week we saw De Beers introduce Lightbox Jewelry, a full-bore, direct to consumer (DTC) retailer that will exclusively use man-made diamonds (MMDs) produced by their Element 6 division.  The concept is neatly packaged to offer a basic selection of body jewelry at moderate prices.  The DTC approach is intended to circumvent the entire traditional channels of distribution established by De Beers over the last century, in an effort to demonstrate that this is just a low-end, low-value product aimed at an under-served public.  De Beers claims that it will only benefit its existing clients by demonstrating how much more valuable "real" diamonds are. This move cam as no surprise at all to me. There are many gaps and holes in this plan, and I will try to outline them in future blog posts. To begin with, I posted three times in 2015 with my views on the subject.  Here are the links to those blog posts, as it would save me time repeating the points I made back then!

The Diamond Crisis

I was prepared to write my next big issue for 2015, number 5, but this week's news in the diamond business has diverted my attention.  Conditions have reached the boiling point, and the future is foggier than ever. Without repeating all the details that I assume most concerned people have already learned, let's look at the upshot.  (A well done update is this week's column by Edahn Golan, issued just before the latest twist.  Look at his column at http://edahngolan.com/how-sightholders-take-care-of-business-a-market-report/)  In essence, the pipeline is stuffed with diamonds.  Some sightholders have been borrowing to buy goods, but using cash flow from under-priced sales to fund investments in other, more profitable ventures.  But many of those ventures have turned sour, and there have been some bankruptcies.  Apparently, there are many dealers under great pressure, and the market is seizing up as there is fear about selling anyone.  While I do not know the details, ther