Skip to main content

The Future of Jewelry, Part 7: Image - In the Age of COVID-19

Here is the list of issues we have been covering — we are up to number 7.
  1. The Gig Economy
  2. Millennials
  3. Climate Change
  4. Consolidation and/or Decline
  5. Natural Diamonds vs Lab-Grown
  6. Banking
  7. Image 
  8. Demographics
  9. Retail Evolution
  10. Industry Structure
_______________________________________

I have been writing about these "issues" for a while.  I did not start out trying to put them in any particular order, but here we are addressing the first of the last four, and all are bound to be particularly affected by the pandemic, no doubt in ways that none of us could have conceived of just months ago.  

The definition of image, and how that definition is being forcefully altered, is one we ponder carefully these days.  The word itself is in many ways more powerful than an alternate that some people use - brand.  Some brands, say Coca Cola, have instant global recognition, but what we retain is sensory - what it tastes like, what the classic bottle looks like.  Such images are far more powerful than any words, though it is the word or words that evoke the images.

Images, and brands, are very hard to develop.  I once heard a highly successful couturier (can't remember the name!) say "My brand hangs by a thread."  Aside of it being a good pun, he was saying that brands are hard to build and maintain but are so easily destroyed.  How true.

In jewelry, we have always seen a parade of companies or individuals proclaim their brands as if they were done deals.  Almost all of them go past us unnoticed and unremembered. Why?  Because there is too often no compelling images associated with them.  A successful brand need not be global or even national.  It only needs to be instantly known by some group of cognoscenti who truly value the story, the design element, the creativity, the extraordinary skills - the image.  

We can call up only a few brands in jewelry that instantly evoke a response - good or bad.  JAR never advertised, but built a brand worthy of special museum shows.  Verdura lives on well past the life of the creator.  We know exactly how Yurman built his brand, and what his image is about.  The global retailers, such as Tiffany, Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpel, and Chanel, have distinct images.  So do some retailers in local markets.  How about Pandora?

But all brands have now been swept up in a storm that has been building for decades.  We first saw that in the diamond business with the reactions to the horrors of African wars and uprisings, funded in part with illicit diamonds, and culminating with the Blood Diamond movie in 2006.  De Beers immediately responded to that film, knowing full well that the diamond "brand hangs by a thread".  

At the time, the public barely reacted, though the Great Recession hitting shortly thereafter, diverting attention away from such concerns.  Since then we have seen an ever-growing   wave of issues accruing social awareness - climate change, sustainability, equal pay, equal access, minority rights, social justice, and personal responsibility.  We witnessed how social media exploded, which contributed to seeing celebrities of all sorts quickly condemned and fired for everything from sexual harassment to racist comments.  There goes their brands.

Now, image/brand has taken on new dimensions that were rarely addressed in the past.  The pandemic has only intensified and accelerated the spread of the nation's structural problems.  We feel the weight of the responsibility we have for each other, and for the need to reinforce ethical standards.  People say that we have politicized our social relations, but I say we have socialized our politics.  People and companies, and their images/brands, are now viewed on where they stand in the spectrum of environmental and social behavior.  Neutrality is out.  A company can no longer say that it stands aside of social or political issues.  

How a company or individual sources components, employs people, and plays a role in the community all count as never before.  A company's policies on a range of issues are as much a part of its image as are the products it sells.

So, perhaps we have a new four C's, those critical to building an image - Competence, Compliance, Content and Character. 








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

De Beers, Lightbox and the Impact on the Diamond Industry

De Beers has announced the formation of a new company, Lightbox, that will be selling man-made diamonds (MMDs), mounted in earrings, pendants and bracelets - no rings. I will assume everyone has read the details, and heard their rationale for claiming that this move will have little or no impact in the natural diamond industry.  Briefly, they will be selling MMDs in finished jewelry with total weights up to one carat, mounted in silver or gold, and with simple pricing - $800 per carat.  There is no grading of the stones, which are white, yellow, blue or pink; the jewelry is meant for “moments” not “milestones” (like weddings). De Beers has arrived at this moment after a few decades of seeing their business transformed from a monopoly into a commercial venture facing all the pressures of a competitive market.   At the turn of the century, Rio Tinto, with their major mine at Argyle in Western Australia, went their own way, sensing that they would do much bett...

Diamond headaches today, a different world tomorrow

The diamond business still cannot seem to get weaned off mama De Beers.  That is not in the way of a complaint to De Beers, but rather an admission that clinging to the old, sheltered ways is gone.  And most of the trade refuses to admit it.  Even the Oppenheimers knew it was time to move on. Sure, a $30 million auction sale is made.  And other big stones are fought over.  But something is wrong at the core of the business.  There are big bankruptcies in Antwerp and Mumbai.  Banks are backing off financing the trade, except for financing solid receivables.  Government authorities are investigating diamond companies in Belgium and India.  De Beers sights are being rejected for lack of money.  Boxes are being sold at discounts - sightholders prefer to take a loss rather than try and convert the goods and lose even more money.  Cutting factories have sharply reduced output, especially on small goods.  And everywhere we hear tha...

Where is retail headed?

Nobody knows for sure.  Present trends show that retailers of all sorts are working hard to adapt to a marketplace that is shifting dramatically.  Jewelry retailers are not exempt from this paradigm shift, but their issues are not quite the same as for other retailers, and that holds true for most of their suppliers. Stated quickly, what are the specific issues confronting traditional jewelry retailers? The low end of the market continues to move steadily towards Internet retailers. The low end of any store's business is the traffic builder, and important opportunities to build long term relationships. The low end of the market, now significantly composed of non-precious materials, is appearing in many non-jewelry environments, further diluting the business. The mid-market has been suffering for decades now, but will still serve a substantial part of the public.  It is increasingly owned by larger chains, but faces daunting prospects due to buyer burnout, a very m...