Skip to main content

Forever, and Forevermark


I finally got a look at Forevermark's web site, and everything took forever.  I viewed it on an I-Mac with plenty of speed and memory.  I mention that up front, because this site uses lots of Flash, and it crawls.  Crawls so badly that my browser timed out waiting to load a page.  When it did load, we see a slick, spare site.  The photos are over-Photoshopped, with metal a shade of gray, and diamonds always blue. 

Navigation is clumsy.  When looking at collections, for example, I had to click back five or six pages just to get to the point where I can look at another collection.  There is an app available too (click here), where one can see oneself wearing a piece.  It is a cute gimmick, but not worth the trouble and waiting.  I looked odd wearing a necklace.

No prices are shown anywhere, so it is left to the visitor to go to the retailer locator to find a store.  For the moment, the retailer outlets listed are very few.  The only New York retailer shown is up in Skaneateles.  Very nice, quiet part of upstate New York, but far from any major market.  And clicking on the retailer goes nowhere.  I presume it is supposed to go the the retailer's web site.  So if you live in New York, you have to call the store to see what they have or take a nice drive.  This is old website thinking.  Nobody wants to frustrate consumers like that any more, and De Beers should know better.

The products, in true De Beers style, are simple and not design intensive.  Certainly not exciting, either.  In order to avoid questions about (potentially) non-Forevermark side stones, there aren't many.  Except, as it turns out, where Everlon of two years ago emerges again as a "new" collection named Concordia!  Now I know where Everlon went.  No new ideas?

The site must talk somewhere about sourcing, and the assurances Forevermark offers.  It was not apparent in my crawling around the site, but it must be there somewhere.  I could go on with other comments on how the site does not help its own objectives, but would I be saying anything that De Beers does not already know?

What a disappointment.  This is it after all these years of effort? 

Comments

Peggy Jo Donahue said…
Here is the sourcing info, Ben:
http://www.forevermarkdiamond.com/us/discover/responsible-sourcing
October 7, 2011 at 6:34 PM
Ben Janowski, Janos Consultants said…
Yes, Peggy Jo. Nicely written, but saying little. Just what are the "highest standards"? And which mines are these? I think the intent is commendable. But we know that participating companies source from many places and nobody can be 100% assured on all stones being used. That is an unavoidable fact, as we see in KP's difficulties, and De Beers knows that. Still, the effort is worthwhile.
October 7, 2011 at 11:48 PM
Forevermark said…
Hello Ben, and thanks for your feedback. We are aware of the speed issue and our IT team is looking into it. In the meantime, take a look at our new US website, which addresses many of your points - for example, you can search for jewelry by price. http://www.forevermarkdiamond.com/us
October 13, 2011 at 9:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Diamond headaches today, a different world tomorrow

The diamond business still cannot seem to get weaned off mama De Beers.  That is not in the way of a complaint to De Beers, but rather an admission that clinging to the old, sheltered ways is gone.  And most of the trade refuses to admit it.  Even the Oppenheimers knew it was time to move on. Sure, a $30 million auction sale is made.  And other big stones are fought over.  But something is wrong at the core of the business.  There are big bankruptcies in Antwerp and Mumbai.  Banks are backing off financing the trade, except for financing solid receivables.  Government authorities are investigating diamond companies in Belgium and India.  De Beers sights are being rejected for lack of money.  Boxes are being sold at discounts - sightholders prefer to take a loss rather than try and convert the goods and lose even more money.  Cutting factories have sharply reduced output, especially on small goods.  And everywhere we hear tha...
8 comments
Read more

The New De Beers

This past week we saw De Beers introduce Lightbox Jewelry, a full-bore, direct to consumer (DTC) retailer that will exclusively use man-made diamonds (MMDs) produced by their Element 6 division.  The concept is neatly packaged to offer a basic selection of body jewelry at moderate prices.  The DTC approach is intended to circumvent the entire traditional channels of distribution established by De Beers over the last century, in an effort to demonstrate that this is just a low-end, low-value product aimed at an under-served public.  De Beers claims that it will only benefit its existing clients by demonstrating how much more valuable "real" diamonds are. This move cam as no surprise at all to me. There are many gaps and holes in this plan, and I will try to outline them in future blog posts. To begin with, I posted three times in 2015 with my views on the subject.  Here are the links to those blog posts, as it would save me time repeating the points I made back...
10 comments
Read more

Where is retail headed?

Nobody knows for sure.  Present trends show that retailers of all sorts are working hard to adapt to a marketplace that is shifting dramatically.  Jewelry retailers are not exempt from this paradigm shift, but their issues are not quite the same as for other retailers, and that holds true for most of their suppliers. Stated quickly, what are the specific issues confronting traditional jewelry retailers? The low end of the market continues to move steadily towards Internet retailers. The low end of any store's business is the traffic builder, and important opportunities to build long term relationships. The low end of the market, now significantly composed of non-precious materials, is appearing in many non-jewelry environments, further diluting the business. The mid-market has been suffering for decades now, but will still serve a substantial part of the public.  It is increasingly owned by larger chains, but faces daunting prospects due to buyer burnout, a very m...
7 comments
Read more